Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
1.
American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine ; 202(1):16, 2020.
Artículo en Inglés | ProQuest Central | ID: covidwho-2098100

RESUMEN

Alvarez et al discuss a case study on home nitric oxide therapy for COVID-19. Infection with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) causes a range of cardiopulmonary and vascular complications, ranging from upper respiratory tract symptoms to severe acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), as well as shock, acute kidney injury, and thromboembolic complications. Zamanian and colleagues present an interesting and compelling case of a patient with pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) who was treated remotely in an ambulatory setting with inhaled nitric oxide (iNO) (5). This patient with well-controlled vasoreactive PAH lived in a remote area more than 300 miles away from their center and experienced symptoms of worsening breathlessness after being diagnosed with COVID-19.

2.
Stem Cells Transl Med ; 10(5): 660-673, 2021 05.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1008163

RESUMEN

Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) in COVID-19 is associated with high mortality. Mesenchymal stem cells are known to exert immunomodulatory and anti-inflammatory effects and could yield beneficial effects in COVID-19 ARDS. The objective of this study was to determine safety and explore efficacy of umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cell (UC-MSC) infusions in subjects with COVID-19 ARDS. A double-blind, phase 1/2a, randomized, controlled trial was performed. Randomization and stratification by ARDS severity was used to foster balance among groups. All subjects were analyzed under intention to treat design. Twenty-four subjects were randomized 1:1 to either UC-MSC treatment (n = 12) or the control group (n = 12). Subjects in the UC-MSC treatment group received two intravenous infusions (at day 0 and 3) of 100 ± 20 × 106 UC-MSCs; controls received two infusions of vehicle solution. Both groups received best standard of care. Primary endpoint was safety (adverse events [AEs]) within 6 hours; cardiac arrest or death within 24 hours postinfusion). Secondary endpoints included patient survival at 31 days after the first infusion and time to recovery. No difference was observed between groups in infusion-associated AEs. No serious adverse events (SAEs) were observed related to UC-MSC infusions. UC-MSC infusions in COVID-19 ARDS were found to be safe. Inflammatory cytokines were significantly decreased in UC-MSC-treated subjects at day 6. Treatment was associated with significantly improved patient survival (91% vs 42%, P = .015), SAE-free survival (P = .008), and time to recovery (P = .03). UC-MSC infusions are safe and could be beneficial in treating subjects with COVID-19 ARDS.


Asunto(s)
Antiinflamatorios/uso terapéutico , COVID-19/terapia , Trasplante de Células Madre Mesenquimatosas/métodos , Citocinas/sangre , Método Doble Ciego , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Trasplante de Células Madre Mesenquimatosas/efectos adversos , Células Madre Mesenquimatosas , Persona de Mediana Edad , SARS-CoV-2/efectos de los fármacos , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Resultado del Tratamiento , Cordón Umbilical/citología
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA